找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 971|回复: 0

你的身份

[复制链接]

2万

主题

810

回帖

12万

积分

管理员

积分
126574
发表于 2019-3-29 09:19 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
委员会 20190322
你的身份

翻译:Nick Chan

There is still quite a lot of misunderstanding regarding your identities.Here is a question from the excellent response we received from our last prompting:

关于你的身份依旧有着大量的误解。这里有一个从我们上一个激励中收到的卓越反应中而来的问题:

“Are we all literally the exact same “I AM”Presence or does the One “I AM”individuate or split into sub-“I AM”‘s? In other words, to what extent is Jack fully Amy who is fully Juanita?”

“我们都是完全相同的‘我是’存在吗?还是唯一的‘我是’个体化或分裂成次‘我是’?换句话说,到什么程度,张三会完全成为李四,谁是完全的赵钱?”

We will answer this in more than one way.

我们会在许多方式中回答这个问题

To begin, the mindset of either/or creates a problem in itself. To the western mind, if something is one thing, it cannot be another. To the eastern mind, the most common mindset is both/and. To this mind, it is possible for a thing to be more than one thing, and this is obviously true of most things.

首先,非此即彼的心态会自己创造一个问题。对西方人来说,如果某样东西是那个,它就不会是这个。对东方人来说,最普遍的心态就是两者/且。对我们来说,一样东西可以是很多东西,这对大多数事物来说很明显是真的

This is complicated by your perception that you are a solid, material ‘thing’that is exclusive of all other things.This is a misperception that we have gone to some lengths to correct. It would help if the entire perception of mutually exclusive things were tossed out. It has been shown, for over one hundred years, that this is erroneous. This is caused by your inability to ‘see’at a microscopic level. But the understanding that matter is ultimately energy is already accepted.

这对你的感知(你是一个固态的‘东西’,物质,不包含所有其它东西)来说难以理解。这是我们走了很长的路来纠正的一个误解。如果对相互排斥事物的整体感知被丢掉,将会是有帮助的。一百多年来,它已被证明是错误的。这由你无能力在微观的层面“去看”导致。但对物质最终是能量的理解已经是公认的

Once one understands that matter is only energy, then the step to seeing things as mutually existing energy fields is a simple one to make. And fields affect each other.

一旦一个人明白物质只是能量,那么视事物为互存的能量场就很容易。而场域会影响彼此

Think of a tub of water. Put a drop of blue into one corner of the tub, a drop of red into another, and a drop of green into a third. It is very easy to imagine that they will take on effects from the other colors.

想象一浴缸的水。把一滴蓝色的液体从浴缸的一个角滴下,在另一个角滴下红色的液体,在第三个角滴下绿色的液体。很容易想象它们会影响其它的颜色

Let’s consider an individual human. Call him Frank. Frank is an individual. He has certain characteristics that are familial.He also shows the effect of his schooling, of his town, of his country, and of his species, etc. These are all fields of consciousness.

让我们想象一个个体人类。叫他张三。张三是一个个体。他有一些家族遗传的特性。他还展示了他的教育、自己所在的城镇、他所属的物种等等的影响。这些都是意识场域

Now, in your question, Jack, Amy, and Juanita are individuals.Depending upon how closely associated they are, they each will be affected by the other two. The ways in which they are affected will depend upon their own make-up, among other factors. But they will be affected. This applies, also, to the fields of town, country, etc., that we mentioned above.

现在,你的问题中,张三、李四和赵钱都是个体。取决于他们多么密切相关,他们每个人都会被另外两人影响。他们受影响的方式会取决于他们自己的伪装,在其它因素之中。但他们会受到影响。这也适用于城镇、国家等等场域

Now, the larger question, “Are we all literally the exact same “I AM”Presence or does the One “I AM”individuate or split into sub-“I AM”‘s?”The answer is both/and.

现在,更大的问题,“我们都是完全相同的‘我是’存在吗?还是唯一的‘我是’个体化或分裂成次‘我是’?答案是两者/且”

We, notice that we are including ourselves, are literally the exact same I AM. I AM has individuated. AND we each are fields of consciousness that are affected by all other fields of consciousness –not millions, not billions, not even septillions, not human, not earthly, but ALL.

我们,注意我们包括我们自己,是完全相同的我是。我是具有个体化。我们每一个都是意识场域,受到所有其它意识场域的影响---不是数百万,不是数十亿,也不是百万的七次方,不是人类,不是地球,而是一切

So you may begin to see how very restrictive mankind’s current view of itself is. Begin to understand yourselves as conscious energies and your realization of your possibilities will immediately begin to increase. You are truly a limitless being who is in the process of remembering that you are a limitless being.

所以你可以开始看到人类当前的视角是有多局限。开始去明白自己为有意识的能量,你对自己可能性的领悟会立刻开始增加。你确实是一个无限的存在,正在忆起你是一个无限的存在

A final thought, if we may –we did not say that Jack was fully Amy or that either was fully Juanita. But we WILL say that each of them is fully I AM. Your own definition of I AM is that it is All That Is. If I AM is All That Is, then they can be nothing else, nor can you.

最后一个想法,如果可以---我们并不是说张三完全是李四或他们两人完全是赵钱。但我们会说他们每一个都是完全的我是。你自己对我是的定义就是它是一切万有。如果我是是一切万有,那么他们就不会是其它东西,你也一样

Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this.

感谢提供这个机遇来讨论这些东西

原文:http://ronahead.com/2019/03/22/your-identities-the-council/
通灵:Ron Head
翻译:Nick Chan


【觉醒家园】 www.awaker.info
回复

使用道具 举报

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|觉醒家园

GMT+8, 2024-11-25 12:41 , Processed in 0.021487 second(s), 23 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表