为什么囤积或者干脆送人?

明曲

【Brenda Hoffman】5月28日

《为什么囤积或者干脆送人?》

Dear Ones,


亲爱的一们


Likely, you cannot sense any global connection with the phrase, “we’re one.” Even though the phrase is something you contemplate, your news and personal experiences do not reinforce your need to actualize it.


也许，你还无法感到关于“我们是一”的任何全球连接。即使你苦苦沉思这句话，你们的新闻和个人体验并不加强去实行它的需求


You hear the phrase, we’re one and agree with the concept; yet, you believe such will never come to fruition in your lifetime. For those pieces that seem to reinforce accepting all without concerns for gender, sexual orientation, race, relig·ion or creed are being removed – you believe – one by one.


你听说我们是一，并同意这个概念；但，你相信在此生中这是不可能实现的。因为那些看似会加强接纳一切而不在乎性别、性取向、种族、宗·教或教条的碎片被移除---你认为---一个接一个地。


The “we’re one” earth structure needs to be rebuilt and reconfigured solidly instead of precariously as was true for the first build.


“我们是一”的地球结构需要重建和重新配置，坚固地而不是不牢靠地，就像第一个建筑那样


If that belief had been created on a solid foundation, the current nonacceptance and anger would not exist. But then, many of your structures are wobbly regarding action instead of token words.


如果那个信念创造在一个雄厚的基础上，当前的不接纳和愤怒就会不复存在。但是，你们许多的结构是不稳定的，关于行动而不是象征性的话语


You believe those who do not enforce or encourage love for all are very different from you. In truth, they are antagonists created by you, en masse, to ensure that you understand the need for solid structures.


你相信那些并不实行或鼓舞爱的人，因为一切都和你迥然不同。事实上，他们是你创造的反派角色，被你们集体创造的，来确保你能够明白牢固结构的必要性


“Follow the money” motivates your world much more than we’re one.  Your interest in following the money is an offshoot of your societal concerns.


“跟着钱走”比起我们是一更多地激励着你们的世界。你对跟着钱走感兴趣是你们社会关注点的一个衍生物


Perhaps you discuss your interest in helping other countries, races, reli·gions, etc. but if given a choice between millions of dollars or helping others to live a life similar to yours, or next door to you, which would you choose? If you had to think about your response, realize how deeply ingrained your need is to validate success with money.


也许你们讨论了帮助其他国家、种族、宗·教等等的兴趣。但如果给你一个选择，在百万美元和帮助其他人过上和你相似的生活之间，你会选择什么？如果你必须思考一下你的回复，意识到你用金钱来证实成功的需求是多么地根深蒂固


Such a statement is not to chide you nor to inform you that money is evil, but instead for you to understand how you en masse have directed your efforts for some time. Human love waned, as monetary success overtook the need for closeness to one another.


说这些话不是为了斥责你或告知你金钱是邪恶的，而是让你明白有时候你们集体是如何引导你们努力的方向的。人类酷爱亏缺，因为金钱上的成功超越了对另一个人亲近的需求


Now you are angry because love for all is your mantra. But if you were without food or shelter, your monetary needs would likely outweigh your love of others. And if you were monetarily very successful, would you be willing to give those resources away if someone promised that all would be loved if you did?


现在你很愤怒，因为爱一切是你的口头禅。但如果你没有食物或住所，你对金钱的需求可能会超过对他人的爱。如果你是金钱上非常成功的，你会愿意把那些资源给别人吗？如果有人许诺，只要你愿意，一切都会被爱。


Most likely, you will respond that you would equalize monetary rewards if everyone on earth with financial resources would also. So it is you cannot understand how we’re one will ever come to fruition.


最有可能的是，你会回复，你会均衡地分配赏金，如果地球上每一个拥有金钱资源的人也这么去做。所以你无法理解我们是一如何会实现


What you forgot in those thoughts is that love does not have a monetary value. That being penniless is not any more loving than being extremely wealthy. Individuals create wealth and resources appropriate for themselves.


在那些想法中你忘记了爱没有金钱的价值。身无分文并不比腰缠万贯更加有爱。个体为自己创造恰当的财富和资源


You believe loving others means giving your lifestyle and personal rewards away.


你认为爱他人就是意味着赠送你的生活方式和个人回报


That concern shifts you from we’re one to “I better take care of myself before I share my love (personal lifestyle) with others.”


这个担忧将你从我们是一转变到了“在我与他人分享我的爱（个人生活方式）之前我最好先照顾好自己。”


Such is a 3D belief that has little to do with 5D and beyond. For you do not give away your fish, as it were, you teach others how to fish. That is what we’re one truly means. For you to give your creations away because others are not capable of creating the same is much more about a master/servant type relationship than allowing others to be themselves.


这是一个3D的信念，跟5D以及之上没什么关系。因为你不用赠送你的鱼，可以说是，来教别人钓鱼。这就是我们是一真正的含义。因为去赠送你的创造，出于他人无法创造相同的东西，更多的是一个主人/仆人这样的关系，而不是让他人去做自己


Now you are thinking that accepting someone who is a different rel·igion, race, sexual orientation, gender, etc. has very little to do with monetary rewards. We beg to differ. For those with financial resources are not held to the same standards as those without. You can likely name a number of financially successful people of different races, religions, creed, countries, sexual orientation, etc. who are not concerned about crossing any barriers held by those with less financial success.


现在你思考接纳不同宗·教、种族、性取向、性别等等的人和金钱奖励没什么关系。我们不敢苟同。因为那些有着金钱资源的人并不和那些没有的人持有着相同的标准。你可以说出一些金钱上成功的不同种族、宗·教、教条、国家、性取向等等的人。他们并不在乎跨越金钱上不怎么成功之人保持的任何栏栅


Still, you argue that it does not matter to you if someone of the opposite sex, a different relig·ion, sexual orientation, different race, etc. lives next door. Which is possibly true. But overall, you question the wisdom of welcoming those different from you believing that somehow they will take your financial resources, lower the value of your property, or expect too much from you emotionally.


依旧，你争论，别人是异性、有不同的宗·教信·仰、不同的性取向、不同的种族等等对你来说根本毫无关系。这也许是真的。但总的来说，你质疑欢迎与你不同之人的智慧，相信他们会以某种方式拿走你的金钱资源，降低你的财产价值，或者从情感上会对你期望太多


Your 5D parts clamor for we’re one. Your 3D belief is that those of lesser status will take away from your being.


你的5D部分大声地呼吁我们是一。你的3D信念就是那些地位较低的人会拿走你的东西


You are starting to shift – slowly, but still shifting. For love does not carry a price. Nor does teaching someone how to fish. You are no longer part of the master/servant lifestyle. Even though that model continues to be displayed in the media and perhaps your personal lives, such is not who you truly are.


你在开始转变---慢慢地，但依旧在转变。因为爱并没有价格。教别人钓鱼也没有价格。你不再是主人/仆人生活方式的一部分。即使这种模式继续在媒体中上演，也许你的个人生活中，这不再是你真正的所是


We strongly suggest you review your beliefs allowing yourself to acknowledge your 3D biases.


我们强烈建议你审视你的信念，让自己去认识到你的3D偏见


You are the builders of the new structures in whatever way feels most joyful. For some, it is knowing anything is possible. For others, teaching someone to fish, and for still others, it is to protest or destroy those structures they wish to re-create.


你是新结构的建筑师，在感到最具喜悦的方式中。对于一些人，就是明白一切皆有可能。对于其他人，教导他人钓鱼，对于另外一些人，抗议或摧毁他们希望重建的结构


You will know your role by what gives you joy. Nothing more and nothing less.


你会通过什么给予你喜悦而明白自己的角色。不多也不少


But before you can recreate any structures, review your beliefs to determine how closely those structures are tied to monetary rewards. Monetary creations are neither better nor worse than any other creation. So there is no need to hoard your money nor is there any need to give it away.


但在你可以重建任何结构之前，审视你的信念来确定那些结构与金钱奖赏的捆绑是多么的紧密。金钱创造不比任何其他的创造好或差。所以没必要去囤积金钱或送给别人


It is your choice based on your new 5D or beyond being. Allow yourself to decide without reverting to 3D beliefs. So be it. Amen.


这是你的选择，基于新的5D或之上的存在。让自己去决定而不返回3D的信念。就是如此。


阿门

翻译：Nick Chan https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/EGGvuDLWxZHCh2hHHgH5OQ